AI and Compliance: Navigate Regulations, Mitigate Risks

Overview

As AI adoption accelerates, understanding compliance requirements and risk mitigation becomes critical for organizations. Navigate GDPR, AI Act, algorithmic transparency, and ethical AI implementation.

What you’ll learn: AI regulations, compliance frameworks, risk assessment, governance

Critical for: Legal, compliance, risk management, executives

Time: 30 minutes

Key Regulatory Frameworks

EU AI Act

Risk-based approach:

• Prohibited: Social scoring, subliminal manipulation
• High-risk: Employment, credit scoring, law enforcement
• Limited risk: Chatbots, deepfakes (transparency required)
• Minimal risk: AI-enabled video games, spam filters

Compliance requirements for high-risk AI:

• Risk management system
• Data governance
• Technical documentation
• Transparency and user information
• Human oversight
• Accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity

GDPR and AI

Key considerations:

• Right to explanation: Automated decision justification
• Data minimization: Only necessary data
• Purpose limitation: Specified, legitimate purposes
• Accuracy: Keep data up-to-date
• Storage limitation: Don’t keep forever

AI-specific challenges:

• Profiling and automated decisions (Article 22)
• Data used for training
• Model outputs containing personal data
• Right to be forgotten vs model retraining

US Regulations

Sector-specific:

• FCRA: Credit decisions
• ECOA: Fair lending
• EEOC: Employment discrimination
• FTC: Unfair/deceptive practices
• State laws: California CCPA, Colorado AI Act

Emerging federal:

• Algorithmic Accountability Act (proposed)
• AI Bill of Rights (framework)
• NIST AI Risk Management Framework

AI Risk Assessment

Conducting AI Risk Assessment

Prompt template:

Assess risks for this AI system:

System: [Description]
Purpose: [Use case]
Data: [What data it uses]
Decision type: [Automated/Human-in-loop]
Impact: [Effect on individuals]

Evaluate:
1. Risk level (minimal/limited/high/prohibited)
2. Potential harms
3. Bias risks
4. Privacy concerns
5. Security vulnerabilities
6. Regulatory requirements
7. Mitigation strategies

High-Risk AI Checklist

Determine if high-risk:

Is the AI system used for:

Employment & HR:
□ Resume screening
□ Interview analysis
□ Performance evaluation
□ Promotion decisions
□ Termination recommendations

Financial Services:
□ Credit scoring
□ Loan approval
□ Insurance underwriting
□ Fraud detection affecting access

Law Enforcement:
□ Predictive policing
□ Risk assessment
□ Evidence analysis

Critical Infrastructure:
□ Safety controls
□ Resource allocation
□ Emergency response

If yes to any: Likely high-risk, enhanced compliance needed

Bias Detection and Mitigation

Algorithmic Bias Audit

Prompt:

Design bias audit for: [AI system]

System purpose: [Description]
Protected characteristics: [Age, gender, race, etc.]
Training data: [Description]
Output: [What it predicts/decides]

Audit should test:
1. Disparate impact by demographic
2. False positive/negative rates by group
3. Performance parity
4. Calibration across groups
5. Individual fairness

Provide:
- Testing methodology
- Sample size requirements
- Statistical tests
- Acceptance criteria
- Remediation strategies

Fairness Metrics

Tools:

• AI Fairness 360 (IBM): Open-source bias detection
• Fairlearn (Microsoft): Fairness assessment
• What-If Tool (Google): Model behavior visualization
• Aequitas: Bias audit toolkit

Key metrics:

• Demographic parity
• Equal opportunity
• Equalized odds
• Calibration
• Individual fairness

Data Governance for AI

Data Inventory and Mapping

Prompt:

Create data governance framework for AI:

AI systems in use:
- [System 1]: [Data used]
- [System 2]: [Data used]

For each data type:
1. Source and collection method
2. Legal basis for processing
3. Retention period
4. Access controls
5. Data quality measures
6. Subject rights procedures
7. Third-party sharing
8. Cross-border transfers

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

When required:

• Automated decision-making with legal/significant effects
• Large-scale profiling
• Sensitive data processing
• Systematic monitoring

DPIA template:

Data Protection Impact Assessment:

Project: [AI system name]
Date: [Date]

1. Description of processing
   - What data?
   - Why?
   - How?
   - Who has access?

2. Necessity and proportionality
   - Is it necessary?
   - Least intrusive method?
   - Balance with rights?

3. Risks to individuals
   - What could go wrong?
   - Likelihood and severity?
   - Affected groups?

4. Mitigation measures
   - Technical safeguards
   - Organizational controls
   - Individual rights protection

5. Consultation
   - DPO input
   - Stakeholder views
   - Individual concerns

6. Approval
   - Acceptable risk?
   - Sign-off

Transparency and Explainability

AI System Documentation

Required documentation:

1. Technical specs: Architecture, training data, performance
2. Intended use: Purpose, users, deployment context
3. Limitations: Known biases, edge cases, failure modes
4. Testing: Validation methods, results, ongoing monitoring
5. Human oversight: Roles, decision authority, escalation

Prompt for documentation:

Create AI system documentation for: [System name]

Include:
- Executive summary
- System purpose and use cases
- How it works (non-technical explanation)
- Data sources and processing
- Decision-making process
- Human involvement points
- Performance metrics
- Known limitations
- Risk mitigation measures
- Monitoring and updates
- Contact for questions

Audience: [Regulators/Users/Public]

Explainable AI (XAI)

Techniques:

• LIME: Local explanations
• SHAP: Feature importance
• Counterfactual explanations: “What if” scenarios
• Attention visualization: What the model focused on

Prompt for explanations:

Explain this AI decision to: [Stakeholder]

Decision: [What the AI decided]
Input data: [What it considered]
Model: [Type]
Context: [Why it matters]

Provide explanation:
- Why this decision was made
- Key factors that influenced it
- What would change the outcome
- Confidence level
- Human review options

Language: [Technical/Business/General public]

AI Governance Framework

Establishing AI Governance

Key components:

1. AI Ethics Board: Cross-functional oversight
2. AI Inventory: Registry of all AI systems
3. Risk Classification: Tiering by impact
4. Approval Process: Gates for development and deployment
5. Monitoring: Ongoing performance and compliance
6. Incident Response: Handle AI failures
7. Training: AI literacy for organization

Governance policy template:

AI Governance Policy:

1. Scope
   - What AI systems are covered?
   - Exceptions?

2. Principles
   - Fairness
   - Transparency
   - Accountability
   - Privacy
   - Security
   - Human oversight

3. Roles and Responsibilities
   - AI Ethics Board
   - Data Protection Officer
   - AI developers
   - Business owners
   - Compliance team

4. Lifecycle Management
   - Development standards
   - Testing requirements
   - Deployment approval
   - Monitoring obligations
   - Decommissioning process

5. Risk Management
   - Risk assessment process
   - Mitigation requirements
   - Escalation procedures

6. Compliance
   - Regulatory requirements
   - Audit process
   - Reporting obligations

7. Training
   - Mandatory training
   - Role-specific education

8. Enforcement
   - Policy violations
   - Consequences

Vendor and Third-Party AI

Third-Party AI Due Diligence

Checklist:

Evaluate AI vendor/tool:

□ Compliance certifications (ISO, SOC 2)
□ Privacy policy and data handling
□ Training data sources and quality
□ Bias testing and results
□ Explainability features
□ Human oversight capabilities
□ Performance metrics and SLAs
□ Incident history
□ Update and patching process
□ Data deletion procedures
□ Geographic restrictions
□ Insurance coverage
□ Contractual protections
□ Audit rights
□ Exit strategy

Red flags:
- Can't explain how it works
- No bias testing
- Vague data practices
- No performance guarantees
- Limited liability

Contractual Protections

Key clauses:

AI Vendor Contract Provisions:

1. Data Processing Agreement
   - GDPR/CCPA compliance
   - Data location
   - Security measures
   - Subprocessors
   - Breach notification

2. Performance Guarantees
   - Accuracy levels
   - Uptime
   - Response time
   - Bias metrics

3. Transparency
   - Model changes notification
   - Explanation rights
   - Audit rights

4. Liability
   - Errors and omissions
   - Regulatory fines
   - Indemnification
   - Insurance requirements

5. Data Rights
   - Ownership
   - Portability
   - Deletion

6. Termination
   - Data return/deletion
   - Transition assistance
   - Post-termination restrictions

Incident Response

AI Failure Response Plan

Template:

AI Incident Response Plan:

Detection:
- Monitoring alerts
- User reports
- Performance degradation
- Bias indicators

Classification:
- Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Type (Technical/Ethical/Legal)
- Affected users

Response:
1. Immediate: Pause system if needed
2. Investigate: Root cause analysis
3. Communicate: Notify stakeholders
4. Remediate: Fix and test
5. Document: Incident report
6. Review: Lessons learned

Notification requirements:
- Internal escalation
- User notification
- Regulatory reporting (if applicable)
- Public disclosure (if applicable)

AI Ethics Implementation

Ethical AI Principles

Framework:

1. Fairness: No discrimination
2. Transparency: Explainable decisions
3. Privacy: Data protection
4. Accountability: Clear responsibility
5. Safety: Robust and secure
6. Human agency: Human control

Ethical review checklist:

Ethical AI Review for: [Project]

□ Purpose is beneficial and legitimate
□ Privacy by design implemented
□ Bias testing completed
□ Vulnerable groups considered
□ Human oversight defined
□ Transparency requirements met
□ Consent obtained where needed
□ Opt-out mechanisms available
□ Data minimization applied
□ Security measures robust
□ Impact assessment completed
□ Stakeholders consulted
□ Ongoing monitoring planned
□ Incident response ready

Approval: [Ethics Board sign-off]

Staying Compliant

Continuous Compliance

Ongoing activities:

• Regular bias audits
• Performance monitoring
• Data quality checks
• User feedback review
• Regulatory updates tracking
• Staff training
• Documentation updates
• Vendor reassessments

Monitoring dashboard:

Track these metrics:

Performance:
- Accuracy by demographic
- False positive/negative rates
- Response times

Compliance:
- Bias audit schedule status
- Training completion rates
- Incident count and resolution
- Policy violations

Governance:
- AI inventory completeness
- Risk assessments current
- Approvals documented
- Audits completed

Getting Started

Implementation Roadmap

Month 1-2: Assessment

• Inventory AI systems
• Classify by risk level
• Gap analysis vs regulations
• Priority risks identification

Month 3-4: Framework

• Develop governance policy
• Establish AI ethics board
• Create approval processes
• Implement monitoring

Month 5-6: Operationalize

• Train staff
• Deploy tools
• Begin audits
• Document everything

Ongoing: Maintain

• Regular reviews
• Update policies
• Monitor regulations
• Continuous improvement

---

Found an issue? Open an issue!